Armed Conflicts Report
Angola (1975 - first combat deaths)
Update: September 2003
Summary
Type
of Conflict
Parties
to the Conflict
Status of the Fighting
Number of Deaths
Political Developments
Background
Arms Sources
Economic Factors
Summary:
2003 The Angolan civil war
ended in mid-2002 and throughout 2003 the country began the process
of rebuilding. Since the end of the conflict, more than a million
Angolans who had fled the country have returned. The main rebel
group, Unita, laid down its weapons and re-established itself
as a political party. However, in spite of the absence of violence,
many problems must be overcome to stabilize the country.
"What we have now in Angola is negative
peace. It is the absence of violence, yes. But it is peace without
justice, peace without opportunity, peace without democracy. This
is not a peace that promises much to the Angolan people." [The
New York Times, July 30, 2003]
"The ceasefire has held, elections
are on the horizon, and there have been no reprisals, but otherwise
little has gone right for the former rebels... Aid agencies warn
that starvation, disease and retribution threaten an estimated 400,000
Unita rebels and their families. Diplomats warn that democracy and
stability will elude Angola unless the rebels are integrated." [The
Guardian Weekly, February 27-March 5, 2003]
2002 The war in Angola ended
mid-year following the death of Jonas Savimbi in an ambush by
the Angolan military in February. The government and the political
wing of UNITA signed a ceasefire and agreed to adhere to the terms
of the 1994 Lusaka Protocol.
2001 The government offensive
led to a shift in tactics by the rebel group UNITA, away from
direct military confrontations with the government, to more hit
and run guerilla style attacks. These attacks were primarily focused
on civilian targets, and especially on towns and transportation
vehicles where the highest casualties were reported. A UNITA peace
plan was rejected by the government which maintained that the
Lusaka protocol of 1994 was the only instrument for peace.
2000 The Angolan government
gained control of 92 percent of Angola after a series of back-to-back
victories. Though seriously weakened, UNITA rebels managed to
continue hit and run attacks in much of the countryside. There
were reports of the Namibian army fighting alongside the Angolan
army as well as of heightened tensions in neighbouring Zambia.
In March, the UN released a report identifying political leaders
and countries accused of violations of UN sanctions against UNITA.
Approximately 1,000 people died in the conflict this year.
1999 The armed conflict between
government forces and UNITA rebels intensified, resulting in major
rebel losses. UNITA was cleared out of its strongholds in the
highland towns of Andulo and Bailundo and lost a vast territory
to government forces. Thousands were killed in the fighting, a
major increase from the estimated conflict deaths during 1998.
1998 Conflict erupted again between
the government and rebel forces as the Lusaka Protocol of 1994
broke down, with each side accusing the other of not following
the peace accord=s
provisions. The rebels= new offensive resulted in their
retaking more than half the Angolan countryside.
Type of Conflict:
State control
Parties to the Conflict:
1. Government, led by President Jose
Eduardo dos Santos:
Ruling Popular Movement for the Liberation
of Angola (MPLA);
2. Rebels, led by Jonas Savimbi:
National Union for the Total Independence
of Angola (UNITA).
Status of Fighting:
2002 Fighting declined significantly
and eventually ended almost completely this year following the
February death of Jonas Savimbi and the signing of a ceasefire
in March.
2001 After
losing territory, resources and weapons in the government offensive
of 2000, UNITA shifted its tactics from direct battlefield engagements
to guerilla style attacks. The focus of the guerilla attacks also
shifted from military targets to civilians ones, including towns
and public transportation, where the most damage and loss of life
occurred.
"UNITA was all but routed in 1999,
but has managed to regroup since then, operating no longer as a
conventional army but as an increasingly effective guerilla force.
The rebels’ main aim at the moment seems to be to strike hard in
the Angolan Government’s own heartland." [BBC News, July
3, 2001]
"UNITA continued its campaign of attacking
lightly defended towns and civilian convoys, whilst mainly trying
to avoid contact with the Angolan army." [Angola Peace Monitor,
Issue No. 11, Vol. VII, August 1, 2001]
"Nearly one hundred people are dead
in Angola after the train on which they were travelling apparently
hit an anti-tank mine on the track. Eyewitnesses say that armed
men attacked the passengers after the explosion. The assault appears
to be the work of the UNITA rebels, who have carried out a number
of attacks in northern Angola in the past few months." [BBC News,
August 12, 2001]
"Gunmen fired fired a missile
at a passenger bus and then sprayed the vehicle with gunfire, killing
some 50 people, including several children. Many of the bodies were
charred or blown to pieces in the attack making an accurate victim
count difficult. No one has claimed responsibility but UNITA rebels
are thought to have carried it out." [Associated Press, August
27, 2001]
2000 The Angolan government
gained control of 92 percent of Angola (11 out of 13 districts
by September) after a series of back-to-back victories and the
capture of the UNITA leader’s headquarters at Jamba. Though seriously
weakened and no longer posing a threat to the entire country,
UNITA increased its use of landmines and continued hit and run
attacks in much of the countryside, including within areas considered
to be government strongholds. There were reports that the Namibian
army has joined the Angolan conflict, its army fighting alongside
the Angolan army which also was reportedly engaged in forced recruitment
of Namibian men and women to fight against the rebels. Namibia’s
involvement has in turn heightened tensions in Zambia, where UNITA
bandits searching for food have attacked villages.
"The Angolan army has seized the UNITA
rebel base at Jamba, for years the headquarters of the guerrillas’
leader, Jonas Savimbi...the fall of Jamba gives government forces
almost complete control of Angola’s southern border, further restricting
UNITA’s avenues for retreat in the face of its worst defeats in
more than a decade." [Guardian Weekly, 12 January 2000]
"With the complicity and collaboration
of Namibian authorities, the Angolan army is using deceit and force
to conscript Rundu’s young men and women into a foreign army, according
to peasants, political organizers and clergy here. They say the
forced recruitment began last December, when the Namibian government
allowed the Angolan military to use Namibian soil for its stepped-up
attacks on retreating insurgents as part of an armed offensive that
began last September." [Mar 2-8 Guardian Weekly 2000]
"The Angolan Armed Froces (FAA) have
continued to make gains against Jonas Savimbi’s military remnants.
Fighting has continued along the eastern border with Zambia, and
there have been reports that this has spilled over into Zambian
territory." [Angola Peace Monitor, 10 June 2000]
"The Angolan army, FAA have made further
territorial gains against Jonas Savimbi’s rebel movement - UNITA.
The government now claims to control 92 percent of Angola’s 157
districts, including eleven of the 13 districts in the two main
diamond producing provinces of Lunda Sul and Lunda Notre." [The
Angola Peace Monitor, 26 July 2000]
"However, the rebels have also continued
to attack people and property in the government-controlled areas.
UNITA are no longer in a position to threaten to take over the country,
but by making much of the country unsafe they are succeeding in
their campaign to deny hundreds of thousands of people the right
to live in their homes and work their land." [Angola Peace Monitor,
1 September, 2000]
1999
Fighting between government forces and UNITA rebels intensified
in 1999, resulting in major rebel losses. In October, UNITA was
dislodged from its strongholds in the highland towns of Andulo
and Bailundo. By year end there were questions whether UNITA could
continue as a potent military force.
AUNITA
has lost all its former bases, including its more recent headquarters
in the central highland towns of Andulo and Bailundo two months
ago.@ [Guardian
Weekly, Jan. 6-12, 2000]
AThe
conventional military capacity built up UNITA since it pledged to
disarm in 1994 has been severely damaged, leaving questions about
whether it can operate as a single military force. However, senior
Angolan military officers recognize that the capacity for UNITA
to continue as a dangerous guerrilla force remains.
AThe
Chief of Staff of the Angolan Army, General Joao De Matos, speaking
in Catumbela on 18 December, said that UNITA no longer has the capacity
to take control of the country by force. He claimed that UNITA had
lost more than 80% of its fighting capacity, with the army seizing
from the rebels 15, 000 tonnes of weapons, munitions and other equipment,
27 tanks, 7 artillery emplacements, 30 missiles, and hundreds of
vehicles... A [Angola Peace Monitor, December
21, 1999]
1998 Fighting
was renewed in July 1998, following four years of attempts to
broker a fragile peace. The fighting was limited though consistent
throughout the period of July to November, with full scale war
recurring in December. As the new year approached, it appeared
that an escalation of the fighting would likely result for 1999.
AThe peace treaty that gave Angola,
a country rich in diamond and oil deposits, its longest cease-fire
in 30 years is in shambles. Since June the UNITA rebel forces have
retaken more than half of the countryside, engaging the Angolan
Army in hundreds of places and flushing more than 200,000 Angolans
from there villages. The fiercest fighting came this month, when
the government decided to attack two rebel strongholds, bombing
the central towns of Andulo and Bailundo for three days. The attacks,
however, underestimated UNITA=s strength
and the army was pushed back, United Nations officials say.@ [New York Times, December 23, 1998]
Number of Deaths:
Total:
At least 500,000 since 1975, including over 300,000 since 1992.
Tens of thousands have been mutilated by anti-personnel mines.
[World Military and Social Expenditures
1996 by Ruth Leger Sivard estimates a total of 750,000.]
"The civil war has killed at least
half a million people, displaced 4.1 million or roughly one third
of the population and devastated the economy of the diamond- and
oil-rich southern African nation." [The Times of India Online,
May 4, 2002]
2002 Estimates of the number of
people killed by the violence this year were not available. However,
media reports claimed that hundreds died of war-related diseases
and starvation between April and December.
"The government army captured or killed
dozens of UNITA’s senior officers before tracking down Mr. Savimbi
in remote eastern Angola." [Associated Press, May 4, 2002]
"Wednesday’s truce talks were set to
take place in an atmosphere of mistrust, deepened by an attack on
Tuesday by armed men suspected of being UNITA members in a village
in the central province of Huambo, killing two people. It was the
first armed attack reported since the government announced it was
ending hostilities against the rebels." [globeandmail.com,
March 20, 2002]
"The fog of war is lifting in Angola
to reveal a country close to the Dark Ages, with more than a million
people starving and homeless after years of living wild in the bush."
[Electronic Telegraph, July 22, 2002]
2001 According
to media reports, more than 800 people died as a result of the
fighting between January and August of 2001.
"Earlier this month some 200 internally
displaced persons could have been killed following what is believed
to be a UNITA attack on Caxito town, some 50 km north of the capital
Luanda. A Danish organization, Development Aid People to People
ADPP was among NGO’s that were severely affected. During the attack
two of its teachers were killed, and another teacher and 61 pupils
were abducted and 120 children are unaccounted for." [All Africa
News Agency, May 28, 2001]
"In their bloodiest attack in months,
UNITA rebels overran a town 60 kilometers from the capital, Luanda.
A statement by the army did not provide casualty figures, but a
Luanda-based officer of an aid organization who was in contact with
colleagues in Caxito said that 79 people, including soldiers, police
officers and civilians, had been slain. UNITA, asserted that it
had killed 37 soldiers and police officers in the raid." [Associated
Press, May 8, 2001]
2000 At
least 1,000 people died in the conflict so far this year.
"The great majority of deliberate and
indiscriminate killings which have occurred along the border, particularly
in northern Kavango region and along Caprivi Strip, have been carried
out by UNITA. In one incident on 6 February, 28 people were killed
and 42 injured, including women and children, when a large UNITA
group attacked the town of Santa Clara on the Angolan side of the
border." [Amnesty International, 22 March 2000]
UNITA claimed last week that its forces
killed 261 government troops in seven of the country’s 18 provinces,
including the diamond-rich northern provinces of Malange and Uige."
[Yahoo Asia News, 11 August 2000]
"The army has reported that it killed
34 UNITA soldiers in military operations around Cuemba at the beginning
of August." [Angola Peace Monitor, 1 September, 2000]
1999
Thousands – with one report estimating over 10,000 people – died
in the conflict in 1999. According to the UN, the number of internally
displaced people reached over a million by the end of the year.
AIncidents
of extrajudicial killings occurred during the year as the war continued
and, although figures and details were unavailable, observers believe
that the number of such killings increased during the year. Security
forces were responsible for numerous extrajudicial killings. Police
frequently participate in shakedowns, muggings, carjackings, and
killings. Major human rights abuses occurred as government forces
carried out counterinsurgency operations. In February government
forces reportedly killed several civilians after retaking the town
of Mbanza Congo from UNITA. In December there was an unconfirmed
report that the FAA killed 47 civilians during operations in the
Luanda Sul province. Government aircraft bombed military targets
in UNITA-held towns, which reportedly resulted in civilian casualties....
AThe shelling of cities by UNITA forces often killed civilians,
particularly in Malange, Huambo, and Kuito. According to the Bishop
of Malange, more than 1,000 persons were killed, and 700 injured,
as a result of shelling; however, this report could not be confirmed."
[US State Department Human Rights Report, February 2000]
"The UN Humanitarian Coordination Unit
(UCAH) in Angola reported that the number of people internally displaced
by fighting between the government forces and UNITA had now reached
over million." [IRIN, December 21, 1999]
"The civil war between UNITA rebels
and the government forces has killed 10,000 people in the last four
months, a newspaper reported Monday." [Associated Press, April
5, 1999]
1998 Approximately
600 people died in the renewed conflict, with most of the casualties
occurring during the major escalation in fighting in December.
Political Developments:
2002 Following the death of Jonas
Savimbi in February, the Angolan armed forces and UNITA signed
a ceasefire and agreed to resume the political process set out
by the 1994 Lusaka Protocol which calls for the integration of
former UNITA rebels into the armed forces and the national government.
In August UNITA disbanded its armed wing, marking an official
end to the war. Close to 70,000 former combatants were demobilized
between April and December and 5,000 former UNITA rebels were
integrated into the Angolan Armed Forces. Despite significant
progress by December millions of Angolans were still displaced,
hundreds of thousands faced starvation, serious health problems
or widespread unemployment, and the country remained littered
with landmines and unexploded ordnance.
"Angola began the year 2002 at war.
Today, there is peace in 17 of the country's 18 provinces. The turning
point was the death in February of the veteran Unita rebel leader,
Jonas Savimbi." [BBC News, December 31, 2002]
"The modern UNITA has little ideologically
to unify it. Angola’s civil war began as a cold-war conflict between
the Marxist MPLA and the US-backed UNITA. But the MPLA has long
since abandoned its socialist policies, and the thing that held
UNITA together was Savimbi." [The Christian Science Monitor,
April 29, 2002]
"Angolan army officers have been selecting
5,000 members of the Unita rebel movment to be incorporated into
the Angolan Armed Forces, in accordance with the peace agreement
signed in April." [BBC News, July 15, 2002]
"Despite significant progress towards
lasting peace in Angola, the country still faced major security
and humanitarian challenges..." [IRIN, December 18, 2002]
2001
A peace overture by UNITA to end the fighting and restart peace
talks was rejected by the government in favour of the 1994 Lusaka
Protocol. Angolan President Jose Eduardo dos Santos announced
elections – not held since 1992 – would proceed both for the presidency
and parliament sometime in 2002 or 2003 depending on the status
of fighting. Dos Santos was quoted as saying he would not run
again for the Presidency, noting that if the constitution had
not been suspended due to fighting, he would have served his maximum
two terms in office.
"In its new overture UNITA proposed,
among other things, the formation of a transitional government comprising
of the ruling MPLA, UNITA, and the oppositon National Liberation
Front of Angola (FNLA). It also mooted the creation of a ‘supreme
peace council’. So far the government has rejected the proposal,
sticking to its position that the only mechanism for peace remains
the Lusaka protocol signed in 1994." [Integrated Regional Information
Networks, August 27, 2001]
"President dos Santos told the congress
of the ruling MPLA that elections could take place in 2002 or 2003.
However, the ongoing instability in the country means that a date
for that election remains far from clear." [BBC News, August
23, 2001]
2000 A
UN report under the direction of Canadian UN ambassador Robert
Fowler detailing the violations of Security Council sanctions
against UNITA was presented to the UN Security Council in March.
It identified the political leaders and countries that have continued
trade in diamonds and weapons with UNITA. The Security Council
gave them until November 2000 to adhere to the sanctions or face
reprisals.
"The report specifically identifies
countries (Rwanda, Burkina Faso, Togo, South Africa and Belgium
among others) and political leaders (President Blaise Comparore
of Burkina Faso and President Gnassingbe Eyadema of Togo) as having
been complicit in the trade of weapons and diamonds with UNITA."
[Angola Peace Action Network, 17 April, 2000]
"The UN Security Council Resolution
1295 agreed a mechanism for monitoring and enforcing the sanctions,
and called for the convening of expert conferences or workshops
to help stem sanctions busting on arms and petroleum to UNITA, the
sale of diamonds from UNITA, and to tighten the financial sanctions
against the rebels. The resolution also invited the Southern African
Development Community, SADC, to take action to stop fuel in the
region being diverted to UNITA." [Angola Peace Monitor, 24
May 2000]
1999 There were no negotiations
between the Angolan government and UNITA. The South African Development
Community (SADC) extended political support to the government,
saying Savimbi Aceased to be a viable interlocutor to the solution of the Angolan
conflict.@ Angolan civil society groups have produced a Manifesto
for Peace and others have urged the government to negotiate.
AThe Angolan government will likely
not negotiate with UNITA until the government is in a better military
position than it presently occupies, particularly in light of the
campaign it is waging to vilify Savimbi and brand him a war criminal.
Hardliners within the government exclude any possibility of negotiating
with Savimbi. Others see the possibility if it is in the context
of terms of implementing the Lusaka agreement. The Southern African
Development Community (SADC, a political and economic umbrella for
the governments of the region) supported the government's position
at its August meeting, declaring that Savimbi Aceased to be a viable interlocutor to the solution of
the Angolan conflict.@ Either way, the government at this
juncture only conceives of negotiations over ways to complete the
implementation of the Lusaka process. In this scenario, there might
be interest in conducting direct military-to-military negotiations
on outstanding issues related to demobilization, disarmament, and
integration of military forces....
AAngolan civil society has shown an
increased resolve in its advocacy for peace. Led initially by the
Protestant Church, a diverse group of civil society leaders--mixing
all sorts of points of view--produced a Manifesto for Peace, advocating
for renewed negotiations and arguing for a role for civil society
in the peace process. The Catholic bishops also have contributed
to the push for peace with a pastoral letter calling on the government
to negotiate. A National Convention for Peace will be held near
the end of 1999 to plan more comprehensive strategies for civil
society's involvement in peace. A [John Prendergast, AAngola=s Deadly
War: Dealing With Savimbi=s Hell on Earth@,
USIP Special Report, October 1999]
1998
The peace talks in early 1998 were considered insincere by many
who saw them as a UNITA ploy to refresh troops and revise strategy
after losing much of its source of diamond income in December
1997. The renewed UNITA insurgency in July 1998 followed the MPLA
expulsion in June of UNITA members from the government of national
unity, said to be based on UNITA=s
failure to disarm as part of the peace provisions. With the eruption
of the heavy fighting in December, there was no sign of re-entering
the peace process, with continued escalation of the war a likely
occurrence for 1999.
AUNITA leader Jonas Savimbi and President
dos Santos spoke by telephone in December 1997 for the first time
in many months, agreeing on January 9 to complete the implementation
of the key outstanding elements of the Lusaka Protocol. The development
of a government of national unity, the demobilization of UNITA,
and the full restoration of state control over local government
was due to be completed on February 28. However, UNITA had not fulfilled
its obligations by this time and a new deadline was set for March
16, to be marked by the installation of UNITA==s leadership in Luanda. When UNITA
declared on March 6 that it had demilitarized all its forces, the
government responded by legalizing UNITA as a political party and
appointing three governors and seven vice-governors nominated by
UNITA. Both sides also agreed on the list of six ambassadors nominated
by UNITA. On March 31, a law granting special status to Savimbi
as the leader of the largest opposition party was promulgated.@ [Human
Rights Watch World Report, 1999]
"In the middle of the year, there was
some talk of UNITA dividing, or at least attempting to depose Jonas
Savimbi for ’adopting a policy contrary to interests of members
of his party and to the Angolan people.’ This never came to fruition
and Savimbi remained as leader of UNITA. As well, the MPLA expelled
representatives of UNITA from parliament and the government of national
unity on September 2 because the rebel group had failed to disarm."
[Globe and Mail, September 3, 1998]
Background:
The prolonged civil war is a power struggle
between the two rival movements in the pre-1975 war of independence
against Portugal. At independence, the National Union for the Total
Independence of Angola (UNITA), led by Jonas Savimbi, refused to
accept the new Soviet-backed government of the Popular Movement
for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), and launched an extended bush
war with the help of South Africa and the United States. UN-supervised
elections in 1992, won by the MPLA, yielded only a temporary halt
to the fighting as the defeated UNITA launched the bloodiest phase
of the war during 1993. The following year the rival parties signed
a formal peace agreement, the Lusaka Protocol, calling for the formation
of a coalition government, the integration of UNITA forces into
the Angolan army, and demobilization of remaining combatants. Implementation
of the Protocol advanced haltingly until 1997 when, under the auspices
of a UN observer mission, UNITA representatives joined a government
of unity and 10,000 former UNITA troops were integrated into the
new Angolan Armed Forces. Savimbi and several thousand troops remained
in UNITA-controlled areas, however, and 20,000 of 70,000 demobilized
UNITA troops disappeared from the UN-supervised quartering camps
established as part of the Protocol. In response, the UN imposed
additional sanctions against UNITA. Peace talks in 1998 gave way
to renewed UNITA insurgency following MPLA expulsion of UNITA members
from the government of national unity said to be based in turn on
the rebels= failure
to disarm under the peace provisions.
By 2000 there were indications that
the crisis was spreading to the neighbouring countries of Namibia
and Zambia, as the Angolan government sought to drive UNITA out
of traditional strongholds in the central highlands and further
south and west. According to figures presented to the UN Security
Council by Kofi Annan, approximately 3.7 million people were considered
war-affected, including two million internally displaced. Hundreds
of thousands of others have fled fighting to become refugees in
neighbouring countries.
The war ended in 2002, following the
death of Jonas Savimbi at the hands of the Angolan Armed Forces
in February. By March, the government and UNITA rebels had signed
a ceasefire and had resumed the political process set out in the
Lusaka Protocol of 1994. In August, the war was officially declared
over when UNITA disbanded its military wing.
[Sources: IRIN, 20 January 2000;
Guardian Weekly, 4-10 May, 2000; BBC News, December
31, 2002].
Arms Sources:
Since the Angolan government offensive,
former East bloc countries Bulgaria, Ukraine and Romania have become
UNITA’s main supplier of arms.
Earlier, the government reportedly received recent weapons shipments
from Russia, France, the United States, Belarus, Brazil, Bulgaria,
China, Poland, and South Africa.
In spite of a UN arms embargo against UNITA in place since 1993,
Zaire was both a supplier and main conduit of weapons to the UNITA
rebels until the ousting of President Mobutu in 1997. Ukraine, and
private sources in Albania and in Bulgaria, have been cited as recent
major arms suppliers to UNITA which also has secured arms with the
help of Congo-Brazzaville, Burkina Faso, Togo, and nationals from
Rwanda and South Africa, according to a March 2000 UN report.
[Sources: AAngola Unravels: The Rise and Fall
of the Lusaka Process,@ Human Rights Watch, 1999;
Update Angola, October 17, 1999; The Military Balance
1999/2000, p.250; and Report of the Panel of Experts on Violations
of Security Council Sanctions Against UNITA, March 2000; SIPRI
Yearbook 2002]
"UNITA
was... able to evade a UN arms embargo by relying on a variety
of arms brokers and delivery routes and by securing the complicity
of several governments that provided false end-user certificates
for weapons." [Michael Renner, "The Anatomy of Resource Wars",
2002]
"Former East bloc countries have emerged
as the main supplier of arms to Angola’s UNITA rebel movement as
fears mount in the international community that the rebel leader
Jonas Savimbi may be stockpiling weapons. A report by the United
Nations monitoring team in the trouble-torn country has accused
Bulgaria, Ukraine and Romania of being the main supplier of arms
since the Angolan government offensive and sanctions against UNITA
have crippled the rebel movement’s arms-for-diamonds network." [Mail
and Guardian, February 9, 2001]
AUNITA
has clearly been buying large quantities of arms over several years
to build up a formidable arsenal. Recent UNITA defectors and prisoners
have said that UNITA began to rearm in earnest in 1996. This was
confirmed by Col. Boaventura Chingundo, a senior UNITA officer captured
during fighting in Cunhinga, Bie Province. He said that Zaire (now
the Democratic Republic of Congo), and South Africa had been transit
points for arms to UNITA.@ [Angola Peace Monitor Issue 6, Vol V, Feb 26th,
1999 - full text can be found at http://www.anc.org.za/angola]
Economic Factors:
Angola is endowed with an abundance
of natural resources such as oil and diamonds. There has been fierce
competition for the control of these resources, international sales
of which are used by both sides to pay for the war. UNITA is thought
to have derived close to $3.7 (US) billion from diamond sales from
1992 through to 1998. The United Nations sanctions imposed against
UNITA, along with the Angolan government’s offensive, have had an
impact on UNITA’s ability to acquire and sell diamonds. The United
Nations Monitoring Mechanism on Angolan Sanctions – dealing with
sanctions against UNITA rebels – estimated that UNITA’s diamond
output for 2000 would not surpass the 1999 estimated minimum of
$150 million. The Angolan government relies on oil to buy arms,
and enrich the coffers of corrupt politicians.
"The UN says that arms deliveries to
Unita have been ‘drastically decreased’ but that cross-border supplies
still reach Unita from the DR Congo which remains a major transit
country for Unita diamonds." [Update Angola Supplement, January
19, 2002]
"In its final report submitted in December
2000, the United Nations Monitoring Mechanism on Angolan Sanctions-dealing
with sanctions against UNITA rebels-said the level of UNITA’s diamond
output for 1999 and 2000 could not be estimated, but would certainly
be larger than $150 million. The report also said that UNITA’s capacity
to produce major quantities of diamonds were seriously hampered
by the military situation and that its production in 2000 ‘is certainly
likely to be lower than in 1999' because it had lost access to some
mines." [Integrated Regional Information Networks, April
4, 2001]
"Oil money has bought arms and kept
the war going, particularly in 1993 and 1994, after UNITA captured
most of the diamond fields and threatened to vanquish the government
army." [Michael Renner, "The Anatomy of Resource Wars", 2002]
|